THIS torks me off.
It'll aggravate me even more if he wins.
In short, man marries woman in 2003. Photographer does his job but six years later the groom files suit claiming the pictures weren't up to snuff.
But here's the kicker: The groom divorced his wife a couple years ago. He wants something in the neighborhood of $50,000 to recreate the wedding so he can take the photos over again.....only problem is he doesn't even know where his ex-wife is.
This really ought to get thrown out. It's an old article, so it's probably been ruled on, I just can't bring myself to look it up because if he got a single penny, I won't be able to see straight.....